Directions | Learning | About Us | Enrolments | Principal's Web | Leadership@ELTHAM
 
Members Discussion Room Contact
 

Knowledge: the new commodity for the Global Economy

Email Us for Comment | Becoming a member

 
Home

Articles >>>
Video presentation by Dr. David Warner


Discussions Home

 

THE KNOWLEDGE ERA


SELF DIRECTED LEARNING


SOCIAL ISSUES


GENERAL


 

 

VISION FOR THE FUTURE-VET


AISV Building Partnerships in VETNewsletter, 2002

Dr David Warner
Principal/CEO, ELTHAM College of Education.
 

 


VET is an imperative not an option.

For too many years VET has been seen as an option, an alternative or an add-on. Its inception came years ago as part of a move to make school retention into the senior years more attractive for students for whom the traditional academic pathway was not a realistic option. It was first seriously implemented with modified pre-vocational courses in Queensland in 1986 with the opening of the first Senior College. Pathways education started to become a significant issue in senior schooling and some States discussed convergence. However, vocational study faced enormous difficulties in obtaining status with the traditional academic courses. Serious opposition came from teachers, teacher unions and schools who had very focused views on the purpose of senior schooling. It was, and indeed in some circles still is, regarded as a lesser option and largely for young people who would struggle to succeed in university directed academic courses.

Despite the changes over the past fifteen years in the status of TAFE (vocational education and training in the public sector), employment credibility, cross-credits between TAFE and University and evidence of the success of the TAFE-University and University-TAFE pathways, many schools, teachers, students and parents regard it with a considerable degree of disparagement. In fact, this is witnessed in Victoria’s decision to develop a VCE vocational alternative certificate, VCAL, rather than broaden the VCE to recognise the talents and achievements of all students. It has been extremely challenging to change the tradition of a liberal academic education for all, despite the fact that it was designed for an era in which only the academically bright or reasonably bright but well-off, completed secondary school. Today only 30-40% of school students go onto university (with some 30-40% of these not completing their courses). Even so, the university pathway is acknowledged as superior. Simply read the media VCE scorecards and sum the difference between academic units and VET units and you will get the message!

VET today, therefore, is viewed still as a subject or course alternative, option or add-on and in rare cases as a realistic alternative pathway. We still argue lowering of standards, diverting resources and only for the non-academic. I say this with apologies to those few schools that see VET as an integral component of the curriculum.

However, what of the future?

To gain some sense of the future we need to move beyond seeing VET as an alternative for some students to encourage them to remain at school and gain some credible recognition. We have to ask ourselves what is vocational education within school and move beyond simply equating it with a narrow view of training. VET in schools introduces young people to critical knowledge about and skill for the labour market and can create greater opportunities for all students. We have to ask ourselves whether the key learning skills (critical thinking, problem solving, communication, self-direction, accessing and using information, concept formation, analysis and evaluation, self-reflection) can be developed through vocational education or whether they belong only to the traditional academic disciplines. We have to ask ourselves whether rigour and high standards are part of vocational education. We also can ask some simple questions about the purpose of schooling, learning styles, student motivation and how people learn to learn. We might then actually value applied learning as a valuable tool for learning to conceptualise and learning to learn.

However, we need to go beyond this to speculate about the future. For at least ten years we have witnessed a massive transformation in the global labour market, and no change has been more drastic than that confronting young people. Not only do they face a world in which learning has to be life-long, but their immediate post-school world will involve concurrent work and learning. Their first full-time job will not really come until they are in their mid-to late twenties. They will face a post-school world in which casual and part-time work is the norm, in fact, it is now more the post-compulsory world rather than the post-school as many senior students are working and going to school at the same time. The labour market is directed largely to knowledge work or service work. Realistically, many young people will be engaged in both job markets.

A key word for the future will be convergence. We will see the convergence of academic and vocational curriculum and all students will be engaged in both. The additional element will be the pressure from the labour market for young people to engage in more work and work-based training as the effects of the decline in the 0-25 population take hold. This work will be service, traditional trade and knowledge work, as with the latter, fifteen year olds will be in increasing demand in areas such as multi-media and IT.

The ageing labour market also will increasingly affect the post-school providers, particularly TAFE. TAFE will move much more into work-force training as the demand for new skills increases. This will open up greater opportunity and need for schools to be involved in entry-level and service industry training. In addition, post-school fees will increase the need for university students to be engaged in casual and part-time work. Work and post-school study will be the norm and university destined senior school students will engage in vocational studies, both to better understand the labour market they will be in and to gain employment competencies to be competitive in the labour market.

Having argued this situation, I also recognize that the move to a greater focus on vocational education will be resisted for a while. Both schools and traditional subject teachers will resist change and mount the age-old arguments about standards and rigour. However, as the population decline in the 0-18 market bites and the need to be involved in employment with study increases, parents will look for schools that provide the opportunities and change will be forced on the resistors.

To conclude, vocational education in senior schooling will converge with the academic. The changing labour market and the increased coupling of study and work will also help give vocational education VCE credibility. Vocational education will expand into more non-traditional areas, particularly applied knowledge work. People, including the VCE/ENTER score focused Victorian media, will recognize it for its creativity, rigour and capacity to develop the disposition and skill for life-long learning.

June 2003


^ top